Federal Rules of Evidence
Over 45 Years of Proven Experience
Five-Time Lawyer of the Year
A Track-Record of Successful Outcomes
Contact Us
DECEMBER 1, 2009
Printed for the us of
THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
111TH CONGRESS
1st Session
DECEMBER 1, 2009
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250
Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS
JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Chairman
HOWARD L. BERMAN, California
RICK BOUCHER, Virginia
JERROLD NADLER, New York
ROBERT C. ‘‘BOBBY’’ SCOTT, Virginia
MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina
ZOE LOFGREN, California
SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas
MAXINE WATERS, California
WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts
ROBERT WEXLER, Florida
STEVE COHEN, Tennessee
HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia
PEDRO PIERLUISI, Puerto Rico
MIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois
JUDY CHU, California
LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois
TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
CHARLES A. GONZALEZ, Texas
ANTHONY D. WEINER, New York
ADAM B. SCHIFF, California
LINDA T. SÁNCHEZ, California
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida
DANIEL MAFFEI, New York
LAMAR SMITH, Texas
F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., Wisconsin
HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina
ELTON GALLEGLY, California
BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia
DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California
DARRELL E. ISSA, California
J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia
STEVE KING, Iowa
TRENT FRANKS, Arizona
LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas
JIM JORDAN, Ohio
TED POE, Texas
JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah
TOM ROONEY, Florida
GREGG HARPER, Mississippi
PERRY APELBAUM, Majority Staff Director and Chief Counsel
SEAN MCLAUGHLIN, Minority Chief of Staff and General Counsel
(II)
FOREWORD
This document contains the Federal Rules of Evidence, as amended to December 1, 2009. The rules were enacted by Public Law 93–595 (approved January 2, 1975) and have been amended by Acts of Congress, and further amended by the United States Supreme Court. This document has been prepared by the Committee in response to the need for an official up-to-date document containing the latest amendments to the rules. For the convenience of the user, where a rule has been amended a reference to the date the amendment was promulgated and the date the amendment became effective follows the text of the rule.
The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure and the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence, Judicial Conference of the United States, prepared notes explaining the purpose and intent of the amendments to the rules. The Committee Notes may be found in the Appendix to Title 28, United States Code, following the particular rule to which they relate.
Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary.
DECEMBER 1, 2009.
(III)
AUTHORITY FOR PROMULGATION OF RULES
TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE
§ 2072. Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe
(a) The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure and rules of evidence for cases in the United States district courts (including proceedings before magistrate judges thereof) and courts of appeals.
(b) Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right. All laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect after such rules have taken effect.
(c) Such rules may define when a ruling of a district court is final for the purposes of appeal under section 1291 of this title. (Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648, eff. Dec. 1, 1988; amended Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §§ 315, 321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5115, 5117.)
- 2073. Rules of procedure and evidence; method of prescribing (a)(1) The Judicial Conference shall prescribe and publish the procedures for the consideration of proposed rules under this section.
(2) The Judicial Conference may authorize the appointment of committees to assist the Conference by recommending rules to be prescribed under sections 2072 and 2075 of this title. Each such committee shall consist of members of the bench and the professional bar, and trial and appellate judges.
(b) The Judicial Conference shall authorize the appointment of a standing committee on rules of practice, procedure, and evidence under subsection (a) of this section. Such standing committee shall review each recommendation of any other committees so appointed and recommend to the Judicial Conference rules of practice, procedure, and evidence and such changes in rules proposed by a committee appointed under subsection (a)(2) of this section as may be necessary to maintain consistency and otherwise promote the interest of justice.
(c)(1) Each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter by any committee appointed under this section shall be open to the public, except when the committee so meeting, in open session and with a majority present, determines that it is in the public interest that all or part of the remainder of the meeting on that day shall be closed to the public, and states the reason for so closing the meeting. Minutes of each meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter shall be maintained by the committee and made available to the public, except that any portion of such minutes, relating to a closed meeting and made available to the public, may contain such deletions as may be necessary to avoid frustrating the purposes of closing the meeting.
(V)
VI
AUTHORITY FOR PROMULGATION OF RULES
(2) Any meeting for the transaction of business under this chapter, by a committee appointed under this section, shall be preceded by sufficient notice to enable all interested persons to attend.
(d) In making a recommendation under this section or under section 2072 or 2075, the body making that recommendation shall provide a proposed rule, an explanatory note on the rule, and a written report explaining the body’s action, including any minority or other separate views.
(e) Failure to comply with this section does not invalidate a rule prescribed under section 2072 or 2075 of this title. (Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4649, eff. Dec. 1, 1988; amended Pub. L. 103–394, title I, § 104(e), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4110.)
- 2074. Rules of procedure and evidence; submission to Congress;
effective date
(a) The Supreme Court shall transmit to the Congress not later than May 1 of the year in which a rule prescribed under section 2072 is to become effective a copy of the proposed rule. Such rule shall take effect no earlier than December 1 of the year in which such rule is so transmitted unless otherwise provided by law. The Supreme Court may fix the extent such rule shall apply to proceedings then pending, except that the Supreme Court shall not require the application of such rule to further proceedings then pending to the extent that, in the opinion of the court in which such proceedings are pending, the application of such rule in such proceedings would not be feasible or would work injustice, in which event the former rule applies.
(b) Any such rule creating, abolishing, or modifying an evidentiary privilege shall have no force or effect unless approved by Act of Congress. (Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4649, eff. Dec. 1, 1988.)
- 2075. Bankruptcy rules The Supreme Court shall have the power to prescribe by general rules, the forms of process, writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice and procedure in cases under title 11. Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right. The Supreme Court shall transmit to Congress not later than May 1 of the year in which a rule prescribed under this section is to become effective a copy of the proposed rule. The rule shall take effect no earlier than December 1 of the year in which it is transmitted to Congress unless otherwise provided by law. The bankruptcy rules promulgated under this section shall prescribe a form for the statement required under section 707(b)(2)(C) of title 11 and may provide general rules on the content of such statement.
(Added Pub. L. 88–623, § 1, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 1001; amended Pub.
L. 95–598, title II, § 247, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672; Pub. L. 103–394,
title I, § 104(f), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4110; Pub. L. 109–8, title XII,
- 1232, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 202.)
HISTORICAL NOTE
The Supreme Court prescribes Federal Rules of Evidence pursuant to section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code, as enacted by Title IV ‘‘Rules Enabling Act’’ of Pub. L. 100–702 (approved November 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4648), effective December 1, 1988, and section 2075 of Title 28. Pursuant to section 2074 of Title 28, the Supreme Court transmits to Congress (not later than May 1 of the year in which a rule prescribed under section 2072 is to become effective) a copy of the proposed rule. The rule takes effect no earlier than December 1 of the year in which the rule is transmitted unless otherwise provided by law.
Pursuant to sections 3402, 3771, and 3772 of Title 18, United States Code, and sections 2072 and 2075 of Title 28, United States Code, as then in effect, the Supreme Court through the Chief Justice submitted Federal Rules of Evidence to Congress on February 5, 1973 (409 U.S. 1132; Cong. Rec., vol. 119, pt. 3, p. 3247, Exec. Comm. 359, H. Doc. 93–46). To allow additional time for Congress to review the proposed rules, Public Law 93–12 (approved March 30, 1973, 87 Stat. 9) provided that the proposed rules ‘‘shall have no force or effect except to the extent, and with such amendments, as they may be expressly approved by Act of Congress’’. Public Law 93–595 1 (approved January 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1926) enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence proposed by the Supreme Court, with amendments made by Congress, to be effective July 1, 1975.
Section 1 of Public Law 94–113 (approved October 16, 1975, 89 Stat. 576) added clause (C) to Rule 801(d)(1), effective October 31, 1975.
Section 1 of Public Law 94–149 (approved December 12, 1975, 89 Stat. 805) enacted technical amendments which affected the Table of Contents and Rules 410, 606(b), 803(23), 804(b)(3), and 1101(e).
Section 2 of Public Law 95–540 (approved October 28, 1978, 92 Stat. 2046) added Rule 412 and inserted item 412 in the Table of Contents. The amendments apply to trials that begin more than thirty days after October 28, 1978.
Section 251 of Public Law 95–598 (approved November 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2673) amended Rule 1101(a) and (b) by striking out ‘‘, referees in bankruptcy,’’ and by substituting ‘‘title 11, United States
1 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
HOUSE REPORTS: No. 93–650 (Comm. on the Judiciary) and No. 93–1597
(Comm. of Conference).
SENATE REPORT No. 93–1277 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 120 (1974):
Jan. 30, Feb. 6, considered and passed House.
Nov. 21, 22, considered and passed Senate, amended.
Dec. 16, Senate agreed to conference report.
Dec. 17, 18, House agreed to conference report.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 11, No. 1:
Jan. 3, 1975, Presidential statement.
(VII)
VIII
HISTORICAL NOTE
Code’’ for ‘‘the Bankruptcy Act’’, effective October 1, 1979, pursuant to section 402(c) of Public Law 95–598.
Section 252 of Public Law 95–598 would have amended Rule 1101(a) by inserting ‘‘the United States Bankruptcy Courts,’’ immediately after ‘‘the United States district courts,’’, effective April 1, 1984, pursuant to section 402(b) of Public Law 95–598. However, following a series of amendments (extending the April 1, 1984, effective date) by Public Laws 98–249, § 1(a), 98–271, § 1(a), 98–299, § 1(a), 98–325, § 1(a), and 98–353, § 121(a), section 402(b) of Public Law 95–598 was amended by section 113 of Public Law 98–353 to provide that the amendment ‘‘shall not be effective’’. An amendment to Rule 410 was proposed by the Supreme Court by order dated April 30, 1979, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (441 U.S. 970, 1007; Cong. Rec., vol. 125, pt. 8, p. 9366, Exec. Comm. 1456; H. Doc. 96–112), and was to be effective August 1, 1979. Public Law 96–42 (approved July 31, 1979, 93 Stat. 326) delayed the effective date of the amendment to Rule 410 until December 1, 1980, or until and to the extent approved by Act of Congress, whichever is earlier. In the absence of further action by Congress, the amendment to Rule 410 became effective December 1, 1980.
Sections 142 and 402 of Public Law 97–164 (approved April 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 45, 57) amended Rule 1101(a), effective October 1, 1982. Section 406 of Public Law 98–473 (approved October 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2067) amended Rule 704.
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated March 2, 1987, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (480 U.S. 1023; Cong. Rec., vol. 133, pt. 4, p. 4484, Exec. Comm. 713; H. Doc. 100–41), and became effective October 1, 1987. The amendments affected Rules 101, 104(c), (d), 106, 404(a)(1), (b), 405(b), 411, 602 to 604, 606, 607, 608(b), 609(a), 610, 611(c), 612, 613, 615, 701, 703, 705, 706(a), 801(a), (d), 803(5), (18), (19), (21), (24), 804(a), (b)(2), (3), (5), 806, 902(2), (3), 1004(3), 1007, and 1101(a).
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 25, 1988, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (485 U.S. 1049; Cong. Rec., vol. 134, pt. 7, p. 9154, Exec. Comm. 3517; H. Doc. 100–187), and became effective November 1, 1988. The amendments affected Rules 101, 602, 608(b), 613(b), 615, 902(3), and 1101(a), (e).
Sections 7046 and 7075 of Public Law 100–690 (approved November 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4400, 4405) amended the Tables of Contents and Rules 412, 615, 804(a)(5), and 1101(a). Section 7075(a) of Public Law 100–690, which directed the amendment of Rule 615 by inserting ‘‘a’’ before ‘‘party which is not a natural person.’’, could not be executed because ‘‘party which is not a natural person.’’ did not appear. However, the word ‘‘a’’ was inserted by the intervening amendment adopted by the Court by order dated April 25, 1988, effective November 1, 1988.
Section 7075(c)(1) of Public Law 100–690, which directed the amendment of Rule 1101(a) by striking ‘‘Rules’’ and inserting ‘‘rules’’, could not be executed because of the intervening amendment adopted by the Court by order dated April 25, 1988, effective November 1, 1988.
An additional amendment was adopted by the Court by order dated January 26, 1990, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (493 U.S. 1175; Cong. Rec., vol. 136, pt. 1, p.
HISTORICAL NOTE
IX
662, Exec. Comm. 2370; H. Doc. 101–142), and became effective December 1, 1990. The amendment affected Rule 609(a).
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 30, 1991, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (500 U.S. 1001; Cong. Rec., vol. 137, pt. 7, p. 9721, Ex. Comm. 1189; H. Doc. 102–76), and became effective December 1, 1991. The amendments affected Rules 404(b) and 1102. Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 22, 1993, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (507 U.S. 1187; Cong. Rec., vol. 139, pt. 6, p. 8127, Ex. Comm. 1104; H. Doc. 103–76), and became effective December 1, 1993. The amendments affected Rules 101, 705, and 1101(a), (e).
An additional amendment was adopted by the Court by order dated April 29, 1994, and transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (511 U.S. 1187; Cong. Rec., vol. 140, pt. 7, p. 8903, Ex. Comm. 3085; H. Doc. 103–250). The amendment affected Rule 412 and was to become effective December 1, 1994. Section 40141(a) of Public Law 103–322 (approved September 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1918) provided that such amendment would take effect on December 1, 1994, but with the general amendment of Rule 412 made by section 40141(b) of Public Law 103–322.
Section 320935(a) of Public Law 103–322 (approved September 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2135) amended the Federal Rules of Evidence by adding Rules 413 to 415, with provisions in section 320935(b)–(e) of Public Law 103–322 relating to the effective date and application of such rules. Pursuant to Pub. L. 103–322, § 320935(c), the Judicial Conference transmitted a report to Congress on February 9, 1995, containing recommendations different from the amendments made by Pub. L. 103–322, § 320935(a). Congress did not adopt the recommendations submitted or provide otherwise by law. Accordingly, Rules 413 to 415, as so added, became effective on July 9, 1995.
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 11, 1997, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (520 U.S. 1323; Cong. Rec., vol. 143, pt. 4, p. 5550, Ex. Comm. 2798; H. Doc. 105–69), and became effective December 1, 1997. The amendments affected Rules 407, 801, 803, 804, and 806 and added Rule 807.
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 24, 1998, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (523 U.S. 1235; Cong. Rec., vol. 144, pt. 6, p. 8151, Ex. Comm. 8996 to Ex. Comm. 8998; H. Doc. 105–268), and became effective December 1, 1998. The amendments affected Rule 615.
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 17, 2000, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (529 U.S. 1189; Cong. Rec., vol. 146, pt. 5, p. 6328, Ex. Comm. 7333; H. Doc. 106–225), and became effective December 1, 2000. The amendments affected Rules 103, 404, 701, 702, 703, 803, and 902. An additional amendment was adopted by the Court by order dated March 27, 2003, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (538 U.S. 1097; Cong. Rec., vol. 149, pt. 6, p. 7689, Ex. Comm. 1494; H. Doc. 108–57), and became effective December 1, 2003. The amendment affected Rule 608.
X
HISTORICAL NOTE
Additional amendments were adopted by the Court by order dated April 12, 2006, transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice on the same day (547 U.S. 1281; Cong. Rec., vol. 152, pt. 6, p. 7213, Ex. Comm. 7320; H. Doc. 109–108), and became effective December 1, 2006. The amendments affected Rules 404, 408, 606, and 609. Section 1 of Public Law 110–322 (approved September 19, 2008, 122 Stat. 3537) added Rule 502 and inserted item 502 in the Table of Contents. The amendments apply in all proceedings commenced after September 19, 2008, and, insofar as is just and practicable, in all proceedings pending on that date.
Committee Notes
Committee Notes prepared by the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure and the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence, Judicial Conference of the United States, explaining the purpose and intent of the amendments are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, United States Code, following the particular rule to which they relate. In addition, the notes are set out in the House documents listed above.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword ………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Authority for promulgation of rules …………………………………………………………..
Historical note ………………………………………………………………………………………..
Page
III
V
VII
RULES
Article I. General Provisions:
Rule 101. Scope ………………………………………………………………………………….
Rule 102. Purpose and construction ………………………………………………………
Rule 103. Rulings on evidence ………………………………………………………………
Rule 104. Preliminary questions …………………………………………………………..
Rule 105. Limited admissibility ……………………………………………………………
Rule 106. Remainder of or related writings or recorded statements …………..
Article II. Judicial Notice:
Rule 201. Judicial notice of adjudicative facts ……………………………………….
Article III. Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceedings:
Rule 301. Presumptions in general in civil actions and proceedings …………..
Rule 302. Applicability of State law in civil actions and proceedings ………..
Article IV. Relevancy and Its Limits:
Rule 401. Definition of ‘‘relevant evidence’’ ……………………………………………
Rule 402. Relevant evidence generally admissible; irrelevant evidence
inadmissible …………………………………………………………………………..
Rule 403. Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion,
or waste of time ……………………………………………………………………..
Rule 404. Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct; exceptions;
other crimes …………………………………………………………………………..
Rule 405. Methods of proving character …………………………………………………
Rule 406. Habit; routine practice ………………………………………………………….
Rule 407. Subsequent remedial measures ……………………………………………….
Rule 408. Compromise and offers to compromise …………………………………….
Rule 409. Payment of medical and similar expenses ………………………………..
Rule 410. Inadmissibility of pleas, plea discussions, and related statements
Rule 411. Liability insurance ……………………………………………………………….
Rule 412. Sex offense cases; relevance of alleged victim’s past sexual
behavior or alleged sexual predisposition …………………………………..
Rule 413. Evidence of similar crimes in sexual assault cases …………………….
Rule 414. Evidence of similar crimes in child molestation cases ……………….
Rule 415. Evidence of similar acts in civil cases concerning sexual assault
or child molestation ……………………………………………………………….
Article V. Privileges:
Rule 501. General rule …………………………………………………………………………
Rule 502. Attorney-client privilege and work product; limitations on waiver
Article VI. Witnesses:
Rule 601. General rule of competency ……………………………………………………
Rule 602. Lack of personal knowledge …………………………………………………..
Rule 603. Oath or affirmation ………………………………………………………………
Rule 604. Interpreters …………………………………………………………………………
Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness ……………………………………………..
Rule 606. Competency of juror as witness ………………………………………………
Rule 607. Who may impeach …………………………………………………………………
Rule 608. Evidence of character and conduct of witness …………………………..
Rule 609. Impeachment by evidence of conviction of crime ………………………
Rule 610. Religious beliefs or opinions …………………………………………………..
Rule 611. Mode and order of interrogation and presentation …………………….
XII
CONTENTS
Article VI. Witnesses—Continued
Rule 612. Writing used to refresh memory ……………………………………………..
Rule 613. Prior statements of witnesses …………………………………………………
Rule 614. Calling and interrogation of witnesses by court ………………………..
Rule 615. Exclusion of witnesses …………………………………………………………..
Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony:
Rule 701. Opinion testimony by lay witnesses ………………………………………..
Rule 702. Testimony by experts ……………………………………………………………
Rule 703. Bases of opinion testimony by experts …………………………………….
Rule 704. Opinion on ultimate issue ………………………………………………………
Rule 705. Disclosure of facts or data underlying expert opinion ………………..
Rule 706. Court appointed experts …………………………………………………………
Article VIII. Hearsay:
Rule 801. Definitions …………………………………………………………………………..
Rule 802. Hearsay rule ………………………………………………………………………..
Rule 803. Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial ………….
Rule 804. Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable ………………………………
Rule 805. Hearsay within hearsay …………………………………………………………
Rule 806. Attacking and supporting credibility of declarant …………………….
Rule 807. Residual exception ………………………………………………………………..
Article IX. Authentication and Identification:
Rule 901. Requirement of authentication or identification ………………………
Rule 902. Self-authentication ………………………………………………………………
Rule 903. Subscribing witness’ testimony unnecessary ……………………………
Article X. Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs:
Rule 1001. Definitions …………………………………………………………………………
Rule 1002. Requirement of original ……………………………………………………….
Rule 1003. Admissibility of duplicates …………………………………………………..
Rule 1004. Admissibility of other evidence of contents …………………………….
Rule 1005. Public records …………………………………………………………………….
Rule 1006. Summaries …………………………………………………………………………
Rule 1007. Testimony or written admission of party ……………………………….
Rule 1008. Functions of court and jury ………………………………………………….
Article XI. Miscellaneous Rules:
Rule 1101. Applicability of rules …………………………………………………………..
Rule 1102. Amendments ………………………………………………………………………
Rule 1103. Title ………………………………………………………………………………….
Federal Rules of Evidence
Federal Rules of Evidence (2017 Edition)
National Court Rules Committee
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2017 Edition)
National Court Rules Committee
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (2017 Edition)
National Court Rules Committee
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (2017 Edition)
National Court Rules Committee
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (2017 Edition)
National Court Rules Committee
Why Carver & Associates
45+ Years of Proven Experience. Thousands of cases won. Award-Winning Representation.
Over 45 Years of Proven Experience
Tom has been a pillar of the Springfield MO legal community for four decades. He has represented over 300 clients in federal cases and literally thousands of clients in Missouri state courts.
Five-Time Lawyer of the Year
Five-time designation by Best Lawyers as “Lawyer of the Year” in the area of criminal law in Springfield, Missouri among numerous other accolades..
A Track-Record of Successful Outcomes
Tom is a fierce advocate for his clients and is known for helping families obtain the best outcome possible. Sentence reductions, dismissals and death row reversals to name a few.
The Power of Experience
When your life is on the line, you don’t want to chance your future to a legal rookie. You need an advocate who has seen it all before and knows how to make the best out of a terrible situation.
Carver & Associates are not only experienced, but effective. Judicial matters can be complicated, and we are on hand to answer your questions and keep you informed on every aspect of your case. We take great pride in using our experience to benefit you.
Thousands of People Helped
Using our experience to secure positive outcomes for our clients.
Felony Assault Trial
Not Guilty
Class A Felony Domestic Assault
Reduced to Misdemeanor
Five Counts of Sex Trafficking
All Charges Dismissed
Federal Death Penalty